<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Fiber Installation, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/2010/01/att-fiber-installation-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/2010/01/att-fiber-installation-part-1/</link>
	<description>News, Announcements, and Status Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roller Network</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/2010/01/att-fiber-installation-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Roller Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/?p=539#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Since AT&amp;T is the ILEC in our area it will actually carry the Sprint circuits. Verizon is unique in that they have separate fiber assets originally installed by Brooks Fiber in the 1990&#039;s which were later acquired by MCI. In our old location we also had SAVVIS, but we disconnected it because it was too expensive and did not have any IPv6 support.

Verizon still hasn&#039;t figured out how to get their circuit to work yet, so this is &quot;plan B&quot; that we mentioned back in December in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/2009/12/colocation-hosting-delays/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since AT&#038;T is the ILEC in our area it will actually carry the Sprint circuits. Verizon is unique in that they have separate fiber assets originally installed by Brooks Fiber in the 1990&#8242;s which were later acquired by MCI. In our old location we also had SAVVIS, but we disconnected it because it was too expensive and did not have any IPv6 support.</p>
<p>Verizon still hasn&#8217;t figured out how to get their circuit to work yet, so this is &#8220;plan B&#8221; that we mentioned back in December in <a href="http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/2009/12/colocation-hosting-delays/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren M. Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/2010/01/att-fiber-installation-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren M. Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/?p=539#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Will this provide native IPv6 connectivity similar to what Sprint is now offering?

And will this be a redundant multi-homed Internet connection supplementing what you will be getting from Sprint and/or Verizon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this provide native IPv6 connectivity similar to what Sprint is now offering?</p>
<p>And will this be a redundant multi-homed Internet connection supplementing what you will be getting from Sprint and/or Verizon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.663 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-07 06:05:22 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
